What’s The No.1 Reason For People Unsubscribing From Email Lists?
By Anna Johnson on March 26th, 2009What’s the main reason for people unsubscribing from your email list? Hint: it’s not offensive emails, and it’s not too much clutter in their email inbox.
The real culprit, according to research by MarketingSherpa, is… irrelevance.
MarketingSherpa’s recent survey of consumers across the United States found that over half – 58 percent – of people who unsubscribed from business email lists or no longer read emails from businesses was due to those emails not being relevant to them.
The second reason for people unsubscribing or no longer reading emails from a business was receiving too many emails from that business (44 percent) and the third reason was receiving too many emails from multiple sources (31 percent).
Other reasons for unsubscribing or no longer reading commercial emails were that: the emails no longer applied to the recipient (20 percent), the recipient’s situation changed (13 percent), and that the recipient chose to use social networks or other media as an alternative to email (8 percent).
So how do you stay relevant to your list? The simple answer is to continue sending your subscribers messages that address their motivation for subscribing to your list in the first place.
Now, there will always be some subscribers who may not realise what they’ve really signed up for when they give you their name and email.
Based on the feedback we’ve received here at Kikabink News, a lot of subscribers have been surprised by the format and content of this newsletter. Same with some of our other email lists, although not to the same extent. I imagine this is the case – for better and worse – for other email lists too.
So there will always be some ‘churn’ due to people signing up and then realising that your emails don’t really address their wants or needs. (There will also be people who STAY on your list because they’ve been pleasantly surprised!)
But apart from that, I think the best way to stay relevant is to, as much as possible, set the expectations your subscribers are likely to have… and then meet those expectations.
A good way of checking to see that you’re meeting those expectations is to keep track of open rates and click-through rates.
These rates are not, of themselves, perfect indicators of your level of readership. For example, the general decline in open rates has as much to do with email filters disabling images as much as anything else. But the trends in those metrics ARE indicative.
After a while, you should start seeing patterns – the headlines, topics and articles that garner the most interest, based on opens and click-throughs.
At the end of the day, relevance is the ‘holy grail’ of email marketing (and probably marketing as a whole). And the good news is that, although you can’t do much about cluttered email inboxes, you can do a lot to stay relevant to your audience.
Source: MarketingSherpa, “The Real Culprit Behind Unsubscribes,” MarketingSherpa, March 17, 2009



March 26th, 2009 at 8:32 pm
while i liked the article, there must be something wrong with the percentage.
58 + 44 + 31 + 20 + 13 + 8% are = 174% ??????
Little bit tooo much.
Can you adjust ?
G.
March 29th, 2009 at 2:31 am
Hi G. the reason the percentages don’t add up to 100% is because the respondents could nominate more than one reason for not reading business emails or unsubscribing. Apologies – I can see that wasn’t apparent from the article.
March 29th, 2009 at 12:37 pm
Thanks for the reply Anna.
Now it makes sense.
I will borrow that article and post it inside Wealthy Affiliates. By the way, I make some promo for your newsletter there as I think you provide good information to your subscribers.
Keep up the great work
G.
March 29th, 2009 at 8:34 pm
I can only agreee with the article. I have spent a lot of time recently in unsubscribing to a lot of different newsletters and other assorted email lists. All because I no longer have any use for whatever is in the emails. I was nearly going to type “interest” instead of “use” and changed my mind. I still have some interest. But no use for the information right now. Who knows? Maybe later.
BTW I commented on lies, damn lies, and statistics in another Kikabink article. Anna’s response to G is spot on as to why we need more information about a statistic, before it can be deemed meaningful. Without anna’s explanation, G may have drawn an incorrect conclusion.
March 29th, 2009 at 11:52 pm
Thanks Guido!