<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Google and Its Search Business Be Regulated?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kikabink.com/news/should-google-and-its-search-business-be-regulated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kikabink.com/news/should-google-and-its-search-business-be-regulated/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News, Comment, Research, Tips and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:47:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Prins</title>
		<link>http://www.kikabink.com/news/should-google-and-its-search-business-be-regulated/comment-page-1/#comment-4866</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Prins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kikabink.com/news/?p=1448#comment-4866</guid>
		<description>my humble opinion on google....

1. it&#039;s getting big enough for concern.  when microsoft got to a point that they were considered a threat to competitive marketing, they ended up in a series of court cases.

2. no need for google to disclose its business model - or its algorythm

but as webmasters, we would like a clear set of rules, and updates to any changes in those rules.

all we ask for is a level playing field.

to take the guesswork out of seo

not that the 900 lbs gorilla cares.....it&#039;s enjoying the game.

any company has a set of rules within which they conduct business.  for instance, if you want a contract with the local steel mill, you need to have documents x, y, and z in place. your capabilities, safety policy and company history must be up to par, and your tax returns must be up to date.

BUT

that is spelled out when you want to do business with them - you don&#039;t have to hear it through the grapevine.

i can understand google wanting to improve user experience. i can understand not wanting to disclose everything, as they do not want the system to be manipulated.

but surely there must be some middle ground somewhere ?

just my 0.02c.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my humble opinion on google&#8230;.</p>
<p>1. it&#8217;s getting big enough for concern.  when microsoft got to a point that they were considered a threat to competitive marketing, they ended up in a series of court cases.</p>
<p>2. no need for google to disclose its business model &#8211; or its algorythm</p>
<p>but as webmasters, we would like a clear set of rules, and updates to any changes in those rules.</p>
<p>all we ask for is a level playing field.</p>
<p>to take the guesswork out of seo</p>
<p>not that the 900 lbs gorilla cares&#8230;..it&#8217;s enjoying the game.</p>
<p>any company has a set of rules within which they conduct business.  for instance, if you want a contract with the local steel mill, you need to have documents x, y, and z in place. your capabilities, safety policy and company history must be up to par, and your tax returns must be up to date.</p>
<p>BUT</p>
<p>that is spelled out when you want to do business with them &#8211; you don&#8217;t have to hear it through the grapevine.</p>
<p>i can understand google wanting to improve user experience. i can understand not wanting to disclose everything, as they do not want the system to be manipulated.</p>
<p>but surely there must be some middle ground somewhere ?</p>
<p>just my 0.02c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
