<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How NOT To Treat Affiliates (You Won&#8217;t Believe This&#8230;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kikabink.com/news/how-not-to-treat-affiliates-you-wont-believe-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kikabink.com/news/how-not-to-treat-affiliates-you-wont-believe-this/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News, Comment, Research, Tips and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kraft</title>
		<link>http://www.kikabink.com/news/how-not-to-treat-affiliates-you-wont-believe-this/comment-page-1/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kikabink.com/news/806/how-not-to-treat-affiliates-you-wont-believe-this/#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>Hey!

I think shaking your head is a perfectly appropriate thing to do.

Are these guys building a business?  Do they understand that their business is built by partnerships with people who know how to get the word out effectively about what they do?

I&#039;m seeing a lot of this lately from affiliate managers.  

On a related topic, I still haven&#039;t been able to get a single affiliate manager (I&#039;ve asked many) to respond to why you would ever completely dump a non-producing affiliate, rather than segmenting them into a &quot;non-productive affiliates&quot; category.

http://www.affiliateadvice.us/affiliate_philosophies/dumping-affiliates-doesnt-produce-affiliate-sales.html

Any thoughts on why an affiliate manager would dump an affiliate who&#039;s not shown sales in the last 3 months?

Thanks for sharing another example of poor judgement on the part of an affiliate manager.  Any suggestions on what we can do to help them see our side?  I&#039;m willing to work to see their side of the coin... it just seems that they&#039;re not really willing to explain anything about their side of the coin, and just expect affiliates to &quot;get&quot; why they do what they do.

Warmest,

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!</p>
<p>I think shaking your head is a perfectly appropriate thing to do.</p>
<p>Are these guys building a business?  Do they understand that their business is built by partnerships with people who know how to get the word out effectively about what they do?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m seeing a lot of this lately from affiliate managers.  </p>
<p>On a related topic, I still haven&#8217;t been able to get a single affiliate manager (I&#8217;ve asked many) to respond to why you would ever completely dump a non-producing affiliate, rather than segmenting them into a &#8220;non-productive affiliates&#8221; category.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.affiliateadvice.us/affiliate_philosophies/dumping-affiliates-doesnt-produce-affiliate-sales.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.affiliateadvice.us/affiliate_philosophies/dumping-affiliates-doesnt-produce-affiliate-sales.html</a></p>
<p>Any thoughts on why an affiliate manager would dump an affiliate who&#8217;s not shown sales in the last 3 months?</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing another example of poor judgement on the part of an affiliate manager.  Any suggestions on what we can do to help them see our side?  I&#8217;m willing to work to see their side of the coin&#8230; it just seems that they&#8217;re not really willing to explain anything about their side of the coin, and just expect affiliates to &#8220;get&#8221; why they do what they do.</p>
<p>Warmest,</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

