<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoDaddy Files Patents For Underwriting and Trading In Domain Name Shares</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kikabink.com/news/godaddy-files-patents-for-underwriting-and-trading-in-domain-name-shares/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kikabink.com/news/godaddy-files-patents-for-underwriting-and-trading-in-domain-name-shares/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News, Comment, Research, Tips and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickard Lande</title>
		<link>http://www.kikabink.com/news/godaddy-files-patents-for-underwriting-and-trading-in-domain-name-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-6227</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickard Lande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kikabink.com/news/?p=1432#comment-6227</guid>
		<description>Well, the obvious difference between these two models is that GoDaddy seems to be heading for an equity type tradeable, whereas Fusu seems to offer participation in a kind of securitized debt.  I have to say, a new exchange facility looking for sufficient liquidity to build a decent, participative market, should list both asset classes - and maybe thrown some derivatives in there too.  Personally, I wouldn&#039;t touch either with a barge pole!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the obvious difference between these two models is that GoDaddy seems to be heading for an equity type tradeable, whereas Fusu seems to offer participation in a kind of securitized debt.  I have to say, a new exchange facility looking for sufficient liquidity to build a decent, participative market, should list both asset classes &#8211; and maybe thrown some derivatives in there too.  Personally, I wouldn&#8217;t touch either with a barge pole!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason - Grab a Free Gift Here</title>
		<link>http://www.kikabink.com/news/godaddy-files-patents-for-underwriting-and-trading-in-domain-name-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-4767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason - Grab a Free Gift Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kikabink.com/news/?p=1432#comment-4767</guid>
		<description>So they think this is a good deal?

Gee, you can buy a domain name for under US$20 per year ( $10 per year in other places, such as http://namecheap.com ) so why would you go for this insulting piece of crap.

I would say - GREEDY DADDY!!!

They can go for it if they want but they may be hit with lawsuits.

Time will tell.

GreeDaddy is a company I would prefer not to deal with.

Nuff said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they think this is a good deal?</p>
<p>Gee, you can buy a domain name for under US$20 per year ( $10 per year in other places, such as <a href="http://namecheap.com" rel="nofollow">http://namecheap.com</a> ) so why would you go for this insulting piece of crap.</p>
<p>I would say &#8211; GREEDY DADDY!!!</p>
<p>They can go for it if they want but they may be hit with lawsuits.</p>
<p>Time will tell.</p>
<p>GreeDaddy is a company I would prefer not to deal with.</p>
<p>Nuff said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

